Author :
Abstract
Bu çalışmada iki uçlu sıfatlardan ve 35 maddeden oluşan Büyük Beş Envanteri-35’in Türkçe’ye çeviri formunun psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu doğrultuda envanter, çalışmaya katılan 18-73 yaşları arasında 507 erkek, 546 kadın olmak üzere toplam 1053 kişiye uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada katılımcıların bir kısmına kriter bağıntılı geçerlik çalışması kapsamında Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri kısa formu uygulanmıştır. Yine katılımcıların bir kısmı, ilk uygulamadan iki hafta sonra tekrar test uygulaması için Büyük Beş Envanteri-35’i yeniden cevaplamışlardır. Elde edilen madde analizi sonuçlarına göre faktörlerde yer alan maddelerin, kendi faktörlerinde yüksek madde-ölçek toplam puan korelasyonu gösterdikleri görülmüştür. Faktörlerin iç tutarlılık güvenirlik katsayıları da Dışadönüklük için 0,83, Uyumluluk için 0,70, Sorumluluk için 0,80, Duygusal Denge için 0,66 ve Zeka için 0,75 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Test-tekrar test uygulamaları arası korelasyonlar ise faktörler için yine aynı sırayla 0,80, 0,60, 0,70, 0,72 ve 0,45 olarak belirlenmiştir. Envanterin yapısal geçerliliğinin test edilmesinde ise doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmış ve envanterin yapısal olarak çok güçlü olmayan model uyumu gösterdiği görülmüştür. Envanterin Türkçe’ye çevrilen formunun çalışma kapsamında elde edilen psikometrik özelliklerine ilişkin sonuçlar ilgili literatür çerçevesinde tartışılmıştır.
Keywords
Abstract
The present study aimed to examine psychometric characteristics of the Turkish translation of the Big Five Inventory-35 which consists of bipolar adjectives and 35 items. For this purpose, the inventory was administered to 507 male and 546 female participants, a total of 1053 people between the ages of 18 and 73. Some of the participants answered the Five Factor Inventory short form for the criterion related validity study. Likewise, some of the participants took part in the retest study and answered the Big Five Inventory-35 two weeks after the first administration. According to the item analysis results, items within each factor showed high corrected item-total correlations. Internal consistency reliability coefficients were computed 0.83 for Exraversion, 0.70 for Agreeableness, 0.80 for Conscientiousness, 0.66 for Emotional Stability, and 0.75 for Intellect. Correlation coefficients between the test-retest administrations were determined 0.80, 0.60, 0.70, 0.72, and 0.45 for the factors respectively. In order to examine the construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted and it was observed that the proposed factorial structure of the inventory revealed weak model fit. Results of the present study concerning the psychometric characteristics of the Turkish translation of the inventory were discussed in line with the related literature.
Keywords
- Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., & John, O. P. (1990). “Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: a psycho-lexical study”, European Journal of Personality, 4(2):89-118.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005a). “A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure”, European Journal of Personality, 19(1):5-24.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005b). “Honesty-Humility, the Big Five, and the Five-Factor Model, Journal of Personality”, 73(5):1321-1354.
- Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2004). “A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 Englishpersonality-descriptive adjectives”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5):707-721.
- Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., di Blas, L., Boies, K., & de Raad,B. (2004). “A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2):356-366.
- Bagby, R. M., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). “Five Factor Model personality disorder scales: Anintroduction to a special section on assessment of maladaptive variants of the five factor model”, Psychological Assessment, 30(1):1-9.
- Block, J. (1995). “A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description”, Psychological Bulletin, 117(2):187-215.
- Burtăverde, V., & De Raad, B. (2017). “Taxonomy and structure of the Romanian personality lexicon”, International Journal of Psychology.
- Cattell, R. B. (1945). “The description of personality: principles and findings in a factor analysis”, The American Journal of Psychology, 58(1):69-90.
- Cohen, A. S., Minor, K. S., Baillie, L. E., & Dahir, A. M. (2008). “Clarifying the linguistic signature: measuring personality from natural speech”, Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(6):559-563.
- Daouk-Öyry, L., Zeinoun, P., Choueiri, L., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2016). “Integrating global andlocal perspectives in psycholexical studies: a GloCal approach”, Journal of Research in Personality, 62, 19-28.
- De Raad, B. (1998). “Five big, big five issues: rationale, content, structure, status, and crosscultural assessment”, European Psychologist, 3(2):113-124.
- De Raad, B., & Hendriks, A. J. (1997). “A psycholexical route to content coverage in personality assessment”, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13(2):85-98.
- De Raad, B., & Mlačić, B. (2017). “The lexical foundation of the Big Five-Factor Model” (Ed. T. A.Widiger), The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model, ss. 191-216, Oxford University Pres, New York.
- DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B., & Gray, J. R. (2014). “Openness to experience, intellect, and cognitive ability”, Journal of Personality Assessment, 96:46-52.
- Di Blas, L., & Forzi, M. (1998). “An alternative taxonomic study of personality-descriptive adjectives in the Italian language”, European Journal of Personality, 12(2):75-101.
- Digman, J. M. (1990). “Personality structure: emergence of the Five-Factor Model”, Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1):417-440.
- Falkenbach, D. M., Reinhard, E. E., & Zappala, M. (2019, baskıda). “Identifying psychopathysubtypes using a broader model of personality: an investigation of the Five Factor Model using model- based cluster analysis”, Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
- Goldberg L. R. (1992). “The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure”, Psychological Assessment, 4(1): 26-42.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1981). “Languages and individual differences: the search for universals inpersonality lexicons. (Ed. L. Wheeler), Review of personality and social psychology, ss. 141-165, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1990). “An alternative ‘description of personality’: the Big-Five factor structure”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6):1216-1229.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1992). “The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure”, Psychological Assessment, 4(1):26-42.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1993). “The structure of phenotypic personality traits”, American Psychologist, 48(1):26-34.
- Gorbaniuk, O., Budzińska, A., Owczarek, M., Bożek, E., & Juros, K. (2013). “The factor structure ofPolish personality-descriptive adjectives: an alternative psycho-lexical study”, European Journal of Personality, 27(3):304-318.
- Imperio, S. M., Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., & Reyes, J. A. S. (2008). “Lexical studies of Filipinoperson descriptors: adding personality-relevant social and physical attributes”, European Journal of Personality, 22(4):291-321.
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). “The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, andtheoretical perspectives. (Ed. L. A. Pervin & O. P. John), Handbook of personality: theory and research, ss. 102-138, Guilford Pres, New York, NY.
- John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). “The lexical approach to personality: a historical review of trait taxonomic research”, European Journal of Personality, 2(3):171-203.
- Kajonius, P. J., & Johnson, J. (2018). “Sex differences in 30 facets of the five factor model ofpersonality in the large public (N= 320,128) ”, Personality and Individual Differences, 129: 126-130.Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). “The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages”, Journal of Personality, 76(5):1001-1054.
- Livaniene, V., & De Raad, B. (2017). “The factor structure of Lithuanian personality-descriptive adjectives of the highest frequency of use”, International Journal of Psychology, 52(6):453-462.
- McCrae, R. R. (1994). Openness to experience: expanding the boundaries of Factor V, “European Journal of Personality”, 8:251-272.
- McCrae, R. R. (2010). “The place of the FFM in personality psychology”, Psychological Inquiry, 21(1):57-64.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). “Validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1):81-90.
- McCrae, R. R., & Sutin, A. R. (2018). “A five-factor theory perspective on causal analysis”, European Journal of Personality, 32(3):151-166.
- Morales-Vives, F., De Raad, B., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2012). “Psycholexical value factors in Spain and their relation with personality traits”, European Journal of Personality, 26(6):551-565.
- Norman, W. T. (1963). “Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factorstructure in peer nomination personality ratings”, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,Norman, W. T. (1967). “2,800 personality trait descriptors: normative operating characteristics for a university population. Ann Arbor, Department of Psychology, The University of Michigan.
- Pace, V. L., & Brannick, M. T. (2010). “How similar are personality scales of the ‘same’ construct? A metaanalytic investigation”, Personality and Individual Differences, 49:669-676.
- Peabody, D., & De Raad, B. (2002). “The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: a comparison across languages”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4):983-997.
- Piedmont, R. L., & Aycock, W. (2007). “An historical analysis of the lexical emergence of the BigFive personality adjective descriptors”, Personality and Individual Differences, 42(6):1059-1068.
- Saucier, G. (2002). “Gone too far or not far enough? Comments on the article by Ashton and Lee (2001) ”, European Journal of Personality, 16(1):55-62.
- Saucier, G. (2003). “An alternative multi-language structure for personality attributes”, European Journal of Personality, 17(3):179-205.
- Saucier, G. (2009). “Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: indications for a Big Six structure”, Journal of Personality, 77(5):1577-1614.
- Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). “Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives”, European Journal of Personality, 10(1):61-77.
- Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). “Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: premises, products, and prospects”, Journal of Personality, 69(6):847-879.
- Saucier, G., Georgiades, S., Tsaousis, I., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). “The factor structure of Greek personality adjectives”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5):856-875.
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). “Evaluating the fit of structuralequation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures”, Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2):23-74.
- Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., & Rowiński, T. (2014). “The circumplex of personality metatraits: asynthesizing model of personality based on the big five”, Review of General Psychology, 18(4):273- 286.
- Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., Damian, R. I., Luchetti, M., Strickhouser, J. E., & Terracciano, A. (2019).“Five-factor model personality traits and verbal fluency in 10 cohorts”, Psychology and Aging,Tatar, A. (2016). “Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanterinin kısa formunun geliştirilmesi”, Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 17(Ek.1):14-23.
- Tatar, A. (2017). “Büyük Beş-50 Kişilik Testinin Türkçeye çevirisi ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri Kısa Formu ile karşılaştırılması”, Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 18(1):51-61.
- Tatar, A. (2018a). “Çok Boyutlu Kişilik Envanterinin geliştirilmesi: madde seçimi ve faktör yapısının oluşturulması”, Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 19(Ek 2):5-13.
- Tatar, A. (2018b). “Gözden Geçirilmiş Uzun ve Kısa Form Altı Faktörlü Kişilik Envanteri(HEXACO-PI-R) Türkçe formunun psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi”, Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 19(Özel sayı 1):5-13.
