INVESTIGATION OF SPORTS-SPECIFIC SUCCESS AND MOTIVATIONS OF LICENSED SPORTS INTERESTED IN SWIMMING SPORTS

Author :  

Year-Number: 2020-27
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 978-993
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Araştırmanın amacı, yüzme sporu yapan sporcuların, spora özgü başarı ve motivasyon düzeylerini incelemektir. Araştırma grubu %75,2 erkek, %24,8 kadın olmak üzere 161 sporcudan oluşmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı, Willis (1982)’ın geliştirdiği, Tiryaki ve Gödelek (1997)’in Türkçeye uyarladığı, 40 maddelik Sporda Başarı Motivasyonu Ölçeği (SÖBMÖ) kullanılmıştır. Verilerein analizinde betimsel istatistikler, t-testi, ANOVA uygulandı. Gruplar arası farklıların belirlenmesinde Bonferroni ve Tamhane kullanıldı. Anlamlılık düzeyi .05 olarak belirlendi. Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulgulara göre; spora özgü başarı ve motivasyon ölçeği ve alt boyutları ile cinsiyet değişkeni arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Ancak ölçeğin toplamından alınan puanlar incelendiğinde erkek sporcuların başarı ve motivasyon düzeylerinin kadın sporculara oranla yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Spora özgü başarı ve motivasyonu ölçeğinin alt boyutlarında ve ölçeğin toplamından elde edilen puan ortalamaları ile yaş ve aynı antrenörle çalışma süresi değişkeni arasında anlamlı farklılık olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Başarıya yaklaşma ve başarıdan kaçınma alt boyutları ile eğitim değişkeni arasında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu tespit edilirken ölçeğin toplamında ve güç gösterme alt boyutunda anlamlı farklılık görülmemiştir. Başarıya yaklaşma güdüsü alt boyutu ile lisanslı sporcu olma süresi değişkeni arasında anlamlı farklılık olduğu görülmüştür. Ancak güç gösterme, başarıdan kaçınma alt boyutları ve ölçeğin toplamından elde edilen puan ortalaması ile lisanslı sporcu olma süresi değişkeni arasında anlamlı farklılık olmadığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca başarıya yaklaşma, başarıdan kaçınma alt boyutları ve ölçeğinden toplamından elde edilen puan ortalamaları ile kaç farklı antrenörle çalıştınız değişkeni arasında anlamlı farklılık olduğu görülmüştür. Ancak güç gösterme güdüsü alt boyutundan elde edilen puan ortalaması ile kaç farklı antrenörle çalıştınız değişkeni arasında anlamlı farklılık olmadığı görülmüştür. Araştırma sonucunda yüzme sporu yapan sporcuların, spora özgü başarı ve motivasyonlarının yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca katılımcıların aldıkları ortalama puan sonucunda sporcuların başarıdan kaçınma güdülerinin de orta seviyenin üstünde olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Araştırmaya katılım sağlayan yüzücülerin aldıkları genel puan sonucunda ise; yüzücülerin spora özgü başarı ve motivasyon düzeylerinin orta seviyenin üzerinde olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of the research is to examine the sports-specific success and motivation levels of athletes doing swimming. The research group consists of 161 athletes, 75.2% male and 24.8% female. The data collection tool, which is developed by Willis (1982) and adapted to Turkish by Tiryaki and Gödelek (1997), is a 40-item Success Motivation in Sport Scale (SÖBMÖ). Descriptive statistics, t-test and ANOVA were applied in the analysis of the data. Bonferroni and Tamhane were used to determine the differences between the groups. Significance level was determined as .05. According to the findings obtained as a result of the research; It has been determined that there is no significant difference between sport-specific success and motivation scale and sub-dimensions and gender variable. However, when the scores obtained from the total of the scale were examined, it was seen that the level of success and motivation of male athletes was higher than that of female athletes. It was observed that there was a significant difference between the sub-dimensions of the sport-specific success and motivation scale and the mean scores obtained from the total of the scale, and the variables of age and working time with the same coach. While it was determined that there was a significant difference between the approach to success and avoidance of success and the variable of education, there was no significant difference in the scale of the scale and in showing strength. It was observed that there was a significant difference between the motivation to approach success sub-dimension and the duration of being a licensed athlete. However, it was observed that there was no significant difference between showing strength, avoidance of success sub-dimensions and mean score obtained from the total of the scale and duration of being a licensed athlete. In addition, it was seen that there was a significant difference between the average of achievement, avoidance of success sub-dimensions and scale, and how many different coaches you worked with. However, it was observed that there was no significant difference between the mean score obtained from the motivation sub-dimension and how many different coaches you worked with. As a result of the research, it was determined that athletes engaged in swimming sports had high success and motivation specific to sports. In addition, as a result of the average score of the participants, it was observed that the athletes' motivation to avoid success was above the middle level. As a result of the overall score received by the swimmers who participated in the research; It has been determined that swimmers' sports-specific success and motivation levels are above the middle level.

Keywords


  • Abakay, U. (2010). The relationship between the footballer-coach communication and the

  • Abakay, U. (2010). The relationship between the footballer-coach communication and theachievement motivation of the footballers in different statuses. PhD Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Medical Science, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Ankara.

  • Abakay, U. ve Kuru, E. (2010). “Achievement motivation of professional and amateur soccer playersin terms of status variables”, Nigde University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 4(3): 186-191

  • Abakay, U. ve Kuru, E. (2013). “The communication level of woman footballers with coach andsuccess motivation relationship”. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), 20-33.

  • Acat, B.M. ve Demiral, S. (2002). Sources of motivation in learning foreign language in Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration in Theory & Practice, 8(31), 312-329.

  • Aktop, A. (2002). Examination of relationship between sport related achievement motivation,psychological and constitutional characteristics. Master Thesis, Akdeniz University, Institute of Medical Science, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Antalya.

  • Arık, İA, (1996). Introduction to Motivation and Excitement. İstanbul: Çantay Publishing House.Aydın, A. (2001). Psychology of Development and Learning. İstanbul: Alfa Publications, 144.

  • Azeez, A.O. (2016). Analysis of 14-16 age group İraqi and Turkish boys' specific level of achievementmotivation to sports. Master Thesis, Gaziantep University, Institute of Medical Science, Gaziantep.Ulukan, H., Şahinler, Y. & Ulukan, M. (2020). “Investigation Of Football Players' State And TraitAnxiety Levels: The Case Of Ankara”, International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 6(60), 1431- 1444. Doi: 10.26449/sssj.2263

  • Başer E, (1998), Psychology of Applied Sport. Bağırgan Publishing House, 3. Edition, Ankara, 186- 188.

  • Baumann, S. (1994). Publishing House, Alfa Publishing Distribution, 1. Edition, İstanbul.

  • Bora, M. V. Cengiz, R., (2016). The Effect of Communication between Student Athletes and PhysicalEducation Teachers on Competition Success and Motivation, SHS Web of Conference, 31, doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20163101016.

  • Bora, M.V. (2013). Communication between teachers and students in physical education sports,sports achievement motivation relations, Master Thesis, Harran University, Institute of Medical Science, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Şanlıurfa.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Data Analysis Handbook for Social Sciences Statistics, Research Pattern SPSS Applications and Interpretation. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2012). Methods of Scientific Research. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publications, 177.

  • Can, Y., Güven, H., Soyer, F., Demirel, M., Bayansalduz, M., Şahin, K. (2009). “The examination ofthe relationship between family-coach-club support and success motivation in elite taekwondo athletes”, International Journal of Human Sciences, 6(2), 240-252.

  • Cox, R. H. (1990). Sport Psychology, Concepts and Applications. Second Edition. Dubuque: Wm C. Brown Publishers, 194-199.

  • Cüceloğlu, D. (1991). Human and Human Behavior. İstanbul; Remzi Bookstore.

  • Çelik, A. (2011). The relations between the conflict management strategies employed by the spotsclub managers and their perfectionist characters and their level of motivation. PhD Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Medical Science, Ankara.

  • Çermik, E. (2001). Profile, work satisfaction and motivation of physics teachers in high schools. Unpublished Master Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Sciences, İstanbul.

  • Dirmen, A. (2015). A comparative analysis of motivation levels for success among female footballteam players in different leagues, Master Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Medical Sciences, İstanbul.

  • Düren, A. (2000). Management in 2000s. İstanbul: Alpha Publishing.

  • Engür, M. (2002). “The effect of achievement motivation on state anxiety levels of elite athletes”, Master Thesis, Ege University, Department of Psycho-Social Fields in Sports, İzmir, 31-32

  • Er, N., Çobanoğlu, G., Er, G., Zekioğlu, A., Yazıcılar, İ., (2003). Analysis of Success Motivation inSport in Terms of Gender. Poster Presentation Presented in Physical Education and Social Areas Congress, Ankara.

  • Gill, D. L. (1986). Psychological Dynamics of Sport, Champaing: IL, Human Kinetics.

  • Gülen, A, (1998) Achievement motivation management at work organizations: A study based onmiddle and executive managers. Master Thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Institute of Social Sciences, Depertmant of Business Administration, Bolu. 45-46.

  • Gürşimsek I. (2002). Motivational beliefs and strategy use related to learning in prospective teachers. Muğla University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8, 135-155.

  • Hayashi, C. T. (1996). Achievement Motivation Among Anglo-American and Hawaiian PhysicalParticipants. Individual Differences and Social Contextual Factors. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 194-215.

  • Hosseınalıpour, F. (2015). The examination of methods of coping with stress and levels of motivationin sport among university student-athletes. Master Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Science, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Ankara.

  • İkizler, C, Karagözoglu, C. (1997). Psychology of Success in Sport, 3. Edition, 44.

  • Karageorghis, C. I. & Terry, P. C. (2011). Inside sport psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Karasar, N. (2012). Methods of Scientific Research. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

  • Karasar, N. (2016). Methods of Scientific Research. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

  • Kılınç, M., Ulucan, H., Kaya, K. ve Türkçapar, Ü. (2012). “Investigatin the motivation levels ofathletes doing team sports using different variables”. Abant İzzet Baysal University Education Faculty Journal, 11(2), 133-144.

  • Koçel T, (2003). Business Management, İstanbul, Beta Publications, 633-653. Konter E. (1995). Motivation in Sports. İzmir: Saray Medical Publishing.

  • Lawrence, A. P. (1996). The Science of Personality, NewYork: John Willey & Sons.

  • Perry, J. Ross, M. Weinstock, J. ve Gfeller, J. (2017). “Examining the Interrelationships betweenMotivation, Conscientiousness, and Individual Endurance Sport Performance”. Journal of Sports Science, 5, 146-156.

  • Richard M, Stres-Lyman W. P. (1975). Motivation and Work Behaviour, McGraw-Hill Series in Management,.

  • Shihui, C., Jin, W., Mei, J. ve On, L.K. (2007). “Motivation of Sport Participation in Elite Athleteswith Physical Disabilities in Mainland China”. Asian Journal of Exercise & Sports Science, 4(1), 63- 67.

  • Soyer F., Can Y., Güven H., Hergüner G., Bayansalduz M., Tetik B. (2010). Investigation of relationbetween motivation of success and team unity of sportsmen. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(1), 225-239.

  • Tiryaki, Ş. (2000). Sports Psychology, Theories and Practice. Mersin: Eylül Book and Publishing House.

  • Tiryaki, Ş., Gödelek E. (1997). Adaptation Study of Sports-Specific Success Motivation Scale forTurkish Athletes, I. International Sports Psychology Symposium Proceeding Booklet, Bagırgan Publishing House, Ankara, 128-141.

  • Turhan, M. (2009). Investigating the relationship between competitive motivation and depression,anxiety levels, and personality characteristics in professional soccer players. Master Thesis, İstanbul Maltepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.

  • Vollmer, F. (1986). The Relationship Between Expectancy and Academic Achievement - How Can it be Explained British Journal of Education Psychology, 56(1), 64-74.

  • Yalçın, İ. (2015). The Analysis Examination Of Achievement Motivation In Hearing Impaired Futsal Players. Master Thesis, Fırat University, Institute of Medical Sciences, Elazığ.

  • Yaman, A. (2017). A research at a state hospital: Analysis of the total quality management practicesand employee motivation on the job satisfaction. Master Thesis, İstanbul Gelişim University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.

  • Yavuz Eroğlu, S., Eroğlu, E. (2019). Anxiety and Sports-Specific Achievement Motivation Levelsof Students Playing in University Sports Teams. Turkish Journal of Sports Science, 3(2);88-96 doi: 10.32706/tusbid.631922

  • http://www.insankaynaklari.com/CN/ContentBody.asp?BodyID=239 (10/11/2009)

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics